This is another reminder to self: Book + Movie > Book | Movie I finished reading “Anything You Can Imagine” on the making of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Great book. Great movies, seen them many times. I’ve stared re-watching them now after having read a deep dive into how hard they were to make. The movies are so much better. Also, it’s probably been a decade since my last watch. ...

I finished “Hitler’s Monsters” yesterday. Meh. Anyway, the book uses a term I’d not heard: “border science”. I took it to mean pseudoscience, or occultism broadly conceived. Maybe. Wikipedia says Pseudoscience is stuff that is not science because it’s not testable, e.g. falsifiable. Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method. Fringe Science Wikipedia has something called “Fringe Science” which seems different again, e.g. fake science. ...

I was just re-reading “Notes on Writing Weird Fiction” by H.P. Lovecraft. In his essay, he gives three structured frameworks: A 5-part procedure of writing weird stories. The 4 types of stories you can write. How to handle the 5 types of horror elements of a story. I thought it might be interesting to extract them and clean them up a little. I fed the essay into DeepSeek R1 and asked it to extract frameworks for modern writers, here’s what I got: ...

Okay, I’ve released and publicly announced Lovecraft Copywork. Here’s the tweet: Checkout my latest site: Write Like Lovecraft! Master the Art of Lovecraftian Style with Copywork.https://t.co/z3CxdtNaNw pic.twitter.com/elFfAf98dS — Jason Brownlee (@jason2brownlee) February 13, 2025 Below are some screenshots. Here’s the landing page that promote the benefits of copywork with lovecraft material specifically: Here’s the stories page: You can pick a story and see which stories you have already started and their progress. I generated iconic images for each story, gives a good horror feeling :) ...

I was reading a book about the Occult + Nazi’s the other day and there was a mention of technical analysis for astrology. As an aside, Germany went bananas for the occult in the early part of the century, then later the Nazi’s, because it was already in the air, e.g. Occultism in Nazism Anyway, my thought: Huh? Technical analysis for a field other than finance… that makes sense I guess. I filed it away to ponder…now. ...

My son made the comment about his school work that all kids make at some point: This is boring. Why do I have to do this? I’m never going to use it! I think it was with regard to some math homework. So, we had “the talk” about schoolwork. I stared off talking about the morning exercises he and his brother do with me: Star-jumps Push-ups Sit-ups Squats I said something like: ...

I finished Sahil Bloom’s “The 5 Types of Wealth” the other day. Toward the end, there was a chapter/section on compounding. It gave the grains of rice chessboard parable, and the usual benefits for understanding it and harnessing it. Good stuff. It got me thinking: We (humans) are terrible at understanding exponentials, like compounding. And: I’d LOVE a tiny book on the magic of compounding. I was thinking a whole lot of stuff to help hammer home the point. ...

Okay, I have developed a new version of Lovecraft Copywork. Here it is: LovecraftCopywork.com (I purchased the domain) It’s great! Firstly, each story is divided into paragraph “passages”. Progress is managed per passage both x/y words and x/y characters, and a little progress bar. The next word to type is indicated and all prose in the passage is gray and becomes back as typed. Any character that is not the next expected character is ignored. ...

I created another different prototype of lovecraft copywork yesterday. I was thinking an “online book” version might be interesting. One story per chapter. Brief history of the story. Synopsis of the story. Structure of the story. All prose for the story. Selected passages from the story. References for further reading. The idea is that one could choose to do copywork with the whole or parts of the story, or with the selected passages. ...

I was thinking more about the lovecraft copywork idea. I think it’s a no-brainer. I think a book is what is needed. For me, handwriting out a 2,000 word story or passage (at the low end) feels onerous. It needs to be buffet of passages from the stories that one can hand-copy as time permits, e.g. 20 min/per day. I asked some reasoning models to extract some passages that show strong writing technique. ...